Název služby
Rodinná asistence
Služba
Služby sociální prevenceSociálně aktivizační služby pro rodiny s dětmi
Forma poskytování služby
Terénní a ambulantní se specifikací, kde je která poskytována - viz níže.
Zařízení poskytovatele
Rodinná asistence
U Rybníka 1568/4, Bruntál 792 01
Kontakty
| telefon: | 733 535 580, 733 535 588 |
| e-mail: | helpinops@atlas.cz |
| web: | www.help-in.cz |
Vedoucí zařízení
Mgr. Jana Hančilová
Název poskytovatele
Help-in, o.p.s.
Adresa poskytovatele
U Rybníka 1568/4, Bruntál 792 01
Komu je služba určena
Děti, mládež a rodina
Děti a rodiče dětí, kteří jsou v evidenci oddělení sociálně právní ochrany dětí městského úřadu a zároveň rodiny, které o službu projeví zájem a v registru oddělení sociálně právní ochrany dětí městského úřadu nejsou.
Věková kategorie
Rodiny s dětmi (0 – 18 let)
Provozní doba
Ambulantní provozní doba| pondělí: | Zavřeno |
| úterý: | Zavřeno |
| středa: | 12:30 - 17:00 |
| čtvrtek: | Zavřeno |
| pátek: | Zavřeno |
| sobota: | Zavřeno |
| neděle: | Zavřeno |
| pondělí: | 07:00 - 12:00, 12:30 - 15:30 |
| úterý: | 07:00 - 12:00, 12:30 - 17:00 |
| středa: | 07:00 - 12:00, 12:30 - 15:30 |
| čtvrtek: | 07:00 - 12:00, 12:30 - 17:00 |
| pátek: | 07:00 - 13:00 |
| sobota: | Zavřeno |
| neděle: | Zavřeno |
Ostatní informace
Terénní služba:
V místě bydliště rodiny, v širším společenském prostředí – škola atd., na území, pro které MěÚ Bruntál vykonává rozšířenou působnost státní správy.
Ambulantní služba:
V sídle společnosti na adrese U Rybníka 4, Bruntál.
Stručná charakteristika - poslání a cíl služby:
Cílem terénní služby Rodinné asistence je minimalizovat počty dětí v ústavní výchově prostřednictvím stabilizace a obnovení funkčnosti v rodinách, ve kterých nařízení ústavní výchovy dítěte/dětí hrozí nebo zlepšit poměry v rodinách tak, aby mohla být ústavní výchova zrušena a dítě/děti se mohly vrátit zpět do svého přirozeného prostředí.
Poskytované činnosti
1) Pracovně výchovná činnost s dětmi a dospělými:
- Podpora při vedení a udržování domácností
- Pomoc při celkovém zlepšování péče o vlastní domácnost
- Pomoc při sestavení rozpočtových výdajů
- Podpora soběstačnosti
2) Pomoc při obnovení nebo upevnění kontaktu s rodinou:
- Podpora a nácvik rodičovského chování
- Upevňování pout mezi dětmi a rodiči – společné a smysluplné trávení volného času, společné aktivity
- Podpora v oblasti rodičovských schopností a dovedností
3) Pomoc při vyřizování běžných záležitostí:
- Praktický nácvik a zvládnutí činností do doby, než je klient schopen zvládnout situaci vlastními silami (správné vyplňování nejrůznějších úředních dokladů, praktický doprovod na úřady, poskytování rad ohledně návazné péče)
4) Zajištění podpory a podmínek pro vzdělávání dětí:
- Pomoc při doučování a přispění ke zlepšení školního prospěchu
- Pomoc při řešení výchovných problémů ve škole
- Dohled a pomoc při přípravě dětí na vyučování
5) Nácvik a upevňování motorických, psychických a sociálních dovedností dětí.
6) Zajištění podmínek pro společensky přijatelné volnočasové aktivity.
7) Doprovod dětí do školy, školských zařízené, k lékaři, na zájmové aktivity i zpět.
8) Socioterapeutické činnosti vedoucí k rozvoji nebo uchování osobních a sociálních schopností a dovedností podporujících sociální začleňování.
Doplňkové služby
Fakultativní činnosti:
- Volnočasové skupinové aktivity pro klienty a jejich děti, případně samostatné akce pro klienty a děti (workshopy, výlety, konference atd.).
- Pomoc při zlepšení a stabilizaci ekonomické situace v rodině. Finanční a dluhové poradenství.
Cena služby
Bezplatná
Nové hodnocení
Many left-wing preppers also have guns. tripscan top Killjoy is open about the fact she owns firearms but calls it one of the least important aspects of her prepping. She lives in rural Appalachia and, as a transgender woman, says the way she’s treated has changed dramatically since Trump’s first election. For those on the left, guns are “for community and self-defense,” she said. Left-wing preppers consistently say the biggest difference between them and their right-wing peers is the rejection of “bunker mentality” — the idea of filling a bunker with beans, rice, guns and ammo and expecting to be able to survive the apocalypse alone. Shonkwiler gives an example of a right-wing guy with a rifle on his back, who falls down the stairs and breaks a leg. If he doesn’t have medical training and a community to help, “he’s going to die before he gets to enjoy all his freeze-dried food.” “People are our greatest asset,” Killjoy said. When Hurricane Helene carved a path of destruction through Asheville, North Carolina in 2024, Killjoy, who used to live in the city, loaded her truck with food and generators and drove there to help. https://tripscan.biz tripskan Inshirah Overton also subscribes to the idea of community. The attorney, who came to prepping after enduring Hurricane Irene in 2011, owns a half-acre plot of land in New Jersey where she grows food and has beehives. She stores fruit, vegetables and honey but also gives them to friends and neighbors. “My plan is to create a community of people who have a vested interest in this garden,” she said. At one point, Overton toyed with the idea of buying a “bug-out” property in Vermont, somewhere to escape to, but desire for community for her and her two daughters stopped her. In Vermont, “no one knows me and I’m just a random Black lady, and they’ll be like: ‘Oh, OK, right, sure. You live here? Sure. Here’s the barrel of my shotgun. Turn around.’” This focus on community may stem in part from left-wing preppers’ growing fears around the climate crisis, predicted to usher in far-reaching ecological, social and economic breakdown. It cannot be escaped by retreating to a bunker for a few weeks. As Trump guts weather agencies, pledges to unwind the Federal Emergency Management Administration and slashes climate funding — all while promising to unleash the fossil fuel industry — climate concerns are only coming into sharper focus. They’re top of mind for Brekke Wagoner, the creator and host of the Sustainable Prepping YouTube channel, who lives in North Carolina with her four children. She fears increasingly deadly summer heat and the “once-in-a-lifetime” storms that keep coming. Climate change “is just undeniable,” she said. Her prepping journey started during Trump’s first term. She was living in California and filled with fear that in the event of a big natural disaster, the federal government would simply not be there. Her house now contains a week’s worth of water, long-term food supplies, flashlights, backup batteries and a solar generator. “My goal is for our family to have all of our needs cared for,” she said, so in an emergency, whatever help is available can go to others. “You can have a preparedness plan that doesn’t involve a bunker and giving up on civilization,” she said.
These preppers have ‘go bags,’ guns and a fear of global disaster. They’re also left-wing трипскан вход The day after President Donald Trump was elected in 2016, Eric Shonkwiler looked at his hiking bag to figure out what supplies he had. “I began to look at that as a resource for escape, should that need to happen,” he said. He didn’t have the terminology for it at the time, but this backpack was his “bug-out bag” — essential supplies for short-term survival. It marked the start of his journey into prepping. In his Ohio home, which he shares with his wife and a Pomeranian dog, Rosemary, he now has a six-month supply of food and water, a couple of firearms and a brood of chickens. “Resources to bridge the gap across a disaster,” he said. https://tripscan.biz tripskan Margaret Killjoy’s entry point was a bleak warning in 2016 from a scientist friend, who told her climate change was pushing the global food system closer than ever to collapse. Killjoy started collecting food, water and generators. She bought a gun and learned how to use it. She started a prepping podcast, Live Like the World is Dying, and grew a community. Prepping has long been dominated by those on the political right. The classic stereotype, albeit not always accurate, is of the lone wolf with a basement full of Spam, a wall full of guns, and a mind full of conspiracy theories. Shonkwiler and Killjoy belong to a much smaller part of the subculture: They are left-wing preppers. This group is also preparing for a doom-filled future, and many also have guns, but they say their prepping emphasizes community and mutual aid over bunkers and isolationism. In an era of barreling crises — from wars to climate change — some say prepping is becoming increasingly appealing to those on the left. The roots of modern-day prepping in the United States go back to the 1950s, when fears of nuclear war reached a fever pitch. The 1970s saw the emergence of the survivalist movement, which dwindled in the 1990s as it became increasingly associated with an extreme-right subculture steeped in racist ideology. A third wave followed in the early 2000s, when the term “prepper” began to be adopted more widely, said Michael Mills, a social scientist at Anglia Ruskin University, who specializes in survivalism and doomsday prepping cultures. Numbers swelled following big disasters such as 9/11, Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and the 2008 financial crisis. A watershed moment for right-wing preppers was the election of Barack Obama in 2008, Mills said. For those on the left, it was Trump’s 2016 election. Preppers of all political stripes are usually motivated by a “foggy cloud of fear” rather than a belief in one specific doomsday scenario playing out, Mills said. Broad anxieties tend to swirl around the possibility of economic crises, pandemics, natural disasters, war and terrorism. “We’ve hit every one of those” since the start of this century, said Anna Maria Bounds, a sociology professor at Queens College, who has written a book about New York’s prepper subculture. These events have solidified many preppers’ fears that, in times of crisis, the government would be “overwhelmed, under-prepared and unwilling to help,” she said.
UK project trials carbon capture at sea to help tackle climate change трип скан The world is betting heavily on carbon capture — a term that refers to various techniques to stop carbon pollution from being released during industrial processes, or removing existing carbon from the atmosphere, to then lock it up permanently. The practice is not free of controversy, with some arguing that carbon capture is expensive, unproven and can serve as a distraction from actually reducing carbon emissions. But it is a fast-growing reality: there are at least 628 carbon capture and storage projects in the pipeline around the world, with a 60% year-on-year increase, according to the latest report from the Global CCS (Carbon Capture and Storage) Institute. The market size was just over $3.5 billion in 2024, but is projected to grow to $14.5 billion by 2032, according to Fortune Business Insights. https://tripscan.biz tripscan Perhaps the most ambitious — and the most expensive — type of carbon capture involves removing carbon dioxide (CO2) directly from the air, although there are just a few such facilities currently in operation worldwide. Some scientists believe that a better option would be to capture carbon from seawater rather than air, because the ocean is the planet’s largest carbon sink, absorbing 25% of all carbon dioxide emissions. In the UK, where the government in 2023 announced up to ?20 billion ($26.7 billion) in funding to support carbon capture, one such project has taken shape near the English Channel. Called SeaCURE, it aims to find out if sea carbon capture actually works, and if it can be competitive with its air counterpart. “The reason why sea water holds so much carbon is that when you put CO2 into the water, 99% of it becomes other forms of dissolved carbon that don’t exchange with the atmosphere,” says Paul Halloran, a professor of Ocean and Climate Science at the University of Exeter, who leads the SeaCURE team. “But it also means it’s very straightforward to take that carbon out of the water.” Pilot plant SeaCURE started building a pilot plant about a year ago, at the Weymouth Sea Life Centre on the southern coast of England. Operational for the past few months, it is designed to process 3,000 liters of seawater per minute and remove an estimated 100 tons of CO2 per year. “We wanted to test the technology in the real environment with real sea water, to identify what problems you hit,” says Halloran, adding that working at a large public aquarium helps because it already has infrastructure to extract seawater and then discharge it back into the ocean. The carbon that is naturally dissolved in the seawater can be easily converted to CO2 by slightly increasing the acidity of the water. To make it come out, the water is trickled over a large surface area with air blowing over it. “In that process, we can constrict over 90% of the carbon out of that water,” Halloran says.
Study reveals how much energy AI uses to answer your questions трип скан Whether it’s answering work emails or drafting wedding vows, generative artificial intelligence tools have become a trusty copilot in many people’s lives. But a growing body of research shows that for every problem AI solves, hidden environmental costs are racking up. Each word in an AI prompt is broken down into clusters of numbers called “token IDs” and sent to massive data centers — some larger than football fields — powered by coal or natural gas plants. There, stacks of large computers generate responses through dozens of rapid calculations. The whole process can take up to 10 times more energy to complete than a regular Google search, according to a frequently cited estimation by the Electric Power Research Institute. https://tripscan.biz tripskan So, for each prompt you give AI, what’s the damage? To find out, researchers in Germany tested 14 large language model (LLM) AI systems by asking them both free-response and multiple-choice questions. Complex questions produced up to six times more carbon dioxide emissions than questions with concise answers. In addition, “smarter” LLMs with more reasoning abilities produced up to 50 times more carbon emissions than simpler systems to answer the same question, the study reported. “This shows us the tradeoff between energy consumption and the accuracy of model performance,” said Maximilian Dauner, a doctoral student at Hochschule Munchen University of Applied Sciences and first author of the Frontiers in Communication study published Wednesday. Typically, these smarter, more energy intensive LLMs have tens of billions more parameters — the biases used for processing token IDs — than smaller, more concise models. “You can think of it like a neural network in the brain. The more neuron connections, the more thinking you can do to answer a question,” Dauner said. What you can do to reduce your carbon footprint Complex questions require more energy in part because of the lengthy explanations many AI models are trained to provide, Dauner said. If you ask an AI chatbot to solve an algebra question for you, it may take you through the steps it took to find the answer, he said.
The CO2 that is extracted from the water is run through a purification process that uses activated carbon in the form of charred coconut husks, and is then ready to be stored. tripscan top In a scaled up system, it would be fed into geological CO2 storage. Before the water is released, its acidity is restored to normal levels, making it ready to absorb more carbon dioxide from the air. “This discharged water that now has very low carbon concentrations needs to refill it, so it’s just trying to suck CO2 from anywhere, and it sucks it from the atmosphere,” says Halloran. “A simple analogy is that we’re squeezing out a sponge and putting it back.” While more tests are needed to understand the full potential of the technology, Halloran admits that it doesn’t “blow direct air capture out the water in terms of the energy costs,” and there are other challenges such as having to remove impurities from the water before releasing it, as well as the potential impact on ecosystems. But, he adds, all carbon capture technologies incur high costs in building plants and infrastructure, and using seawater has one clear advantage: It has a much higher concentration of carbon than air does, “so you should be able to really reduce the capital costs involved in building the plants.” https://tripscan.biz трип скан Mitigating impacts One major concern with any system that captures carbon from seawater is the impact of the discharged water on marine ecosystems. Guy Hooper, a PhD researcher at the University of Exeter, who’s working on this issue at the SeaCURE site, says that low-carbon seawater is released in such small quantities that it is unlikely to have any effect on the marine environment, because it dilutes extremely quickly. However, that doesn’t mean that SeaCURE is automatically safe. “To understand how a scaled-up version of SeaCURE might affect the marine environment, we have been conducting experiments to measure how marine organisms respond to low-carbon seawater,” he adds. “Initial results suggest that some marine organisms, such as plankton and mussels, may be affected when exposed to low-carbon seawater.” To mitigate potential impacts, the seawater can be “pre-diluted” before releasing it into the marine environment, but Hooper warns that a SeaCURE system should not be deployed near any sensitive marine habitats. There is rising interest in carbon capture from seawater — also known as Direct Ocean Capture or DOC — and several startups are operating in the field. Among them is Captura, a spin off from the California Institute of Technology that is working on a pilot project in Hawaii, and Amsterdam-based Brineworks, which says that its method is more cost-effective than air carbon capture. According to Stuart Haszeldine, a professor of Carbon Capture and Storage at the University of Edinburgh, who’s not involved with SeaCURE, although the initiative appears to be more energy efficient than current air capture pilot tests, a full-scale system will require a supply of renewable energy and permanent storage of CO2 by compressing it to become a liquid and then injecting it into porous rocks deep underground. He says the next challenge is for SeaCURE to scale up and “to operate for longer to prove it can capture millions of tons of CO2 each year.” But he believes there is huge potential in recapturing carbon from ocean water. “Total carbon in seawater is about 50 times that in the atmosphere, and carbon can be resident in seawater for tens of thousands of years, causing acidification which damages the plankton and coral reef ecosystems. Removing carbon from the ocean is a giant task, but essential if the consequences of climate change are to be controlled,” he says.
