Název služby
Rodinná asistence
Služba
Služby sociální prevenceSociálně aktivizační služby pro rodiny s dětmi
Forma poskytování služby
Terénní a ambulantní se specifikací, kde je která poskytována - viz níže.
Zařízení poskytovatele
Rodinná asistence
U Rybníka 1568/4, Bruntál 792 01
Kontakty
| telefon: | 733 535 580, 733 535 588 |
| e-mail: | helpinops@atlas.cz |
| web: | www.help-in.cz |
Vedoucí zařízení
Mgr. Jana Hančilová
Název poskytovatele
Help-in, o.p.s.
Adresa poskytovatele
U Rybníka 1568/4, Bruntál 792 01
Komu je služba určena
Děti, mládež a rodina
Děti a rodiče dětí, kteří jsou v evidenci oddělení sociálně právní ochrany dětí městského úřadu a zároveň rodiny, které o službu projeví zájem a v registru oddělení sociálně právní ochrany dětí městského úřadu nejsou.
Věková kategorie
Rodiny s dětmi (0 – 18 let)
Provozní doba
Ambulantní provozní doba| pondělí: | Zavřeno |
| úterý: | Zavřeno |
| středa: | 12:30 - 17:00 |
| čtvrtek: | Zavřeno |
| pátek: | Zavřeno |
| sobota: | Zavřeno |
| neděle: | Zavřeno |
| pondělí: | 07:00 - 12:00, 12:30 - 15:30 |
| úterý: | 07:00 - 12:00, 12:30 - 17:00 |
| středa: | 07:00 - 12:00, 12:30 - 15:30 |
| čtvrtek: | 07:00 - 12:00, 12:30 - 17:00 |
| pátek: | 07:00 - 13:00 |
| sobota: | Zavřeno |
| neděle: | Zavřeno |
Ostatní informace
Terénní služba:
V místě bydliště rodiny, v širším společenském prostředí – škola atd., na území, pro které MěÚ Bruntál vykonává rozšířenou působnost státní správy.
Ambulantní služba:
V sídle společnosti na adrese U Rybníka 4, Bruntál.
Stručná charakteristika - poslání a cíl služby:
Cílem terénní služby Rodinné asistence je minimalizovat počty dětí v ústavní výchově prostřednictvím stabilizace a obnovení funkčnosti v rodinách, ve kterých nařízení ústavní výchovy dítěte/dětí hrozí nebo zlepšit poměry v rodinách tak, aby mohla být ústavní výchova zrušena a dítě/děti se mohly vrátit zpět do svého přirozeného prostředí.
Poskytované činnosti
1) Pracovně výchovná činnost s dětmi a dospělými:
- Podpora při vedení a udržování domácností
- Pomoc při celkovém zlepšování péče o vlastní domácnost
- Pomoc při sestavení rozpočtových výdajů
- Podpora soběstačnosti
2) Pomoc při obnovení nebo upevnění kontaktu s rodinou:
- Podpora a nácvik rodičovského chování
- Upevňování pout mezi dětmi a rodiči – společné a smysluplné trávení volného času, společné aktivity
- Podpora v oblasti rodičovských schopností a dovedností
3) Pomoc při vyřizování běžných záležitostí:
- Praktický nácvik a zvládnutí činností do doby, než je klient schopen zvládnout situaci vlastními silami (správné vyplňování nejrůznějších úředních dokladů, praktický doprovod na úřady, poskytování rad ohledně návazné péče)
4) Zajištění podpory a podmínek pro vzdělávání dětí:
- Pomoc při doučování a přispění ke zlepšení školního prospěchu
- Pomoc při řešení výchovných problémů ve škole
- Dohled a pomoc při přípravě dětí na vyučování
5) Nácvik a upevňování motorických, psychických a sociálních dovedností dětí.
6) Zajištění podmínek pro společensky přijatelné volnočasové aktivity.
7) Doprovod dětí do školy, školských zařízené, k lékaři, na zájmové aktivity i zpět.
8) Socioterapeutické činnosti vedoucí k rozvoji nebo uchování osobních a sociálních schopností a dovedností podporujících sociální začleňování.
Doplňkové služby
Fakultativní činnosti:
- Volnočasové skupinové aktivity pro klienty a jejich děti, případně samostatné akce pro klienty a děti (workshopy, výlety, konference atd.).
- Pomoc při zlepšení a stabilizaci ekonomické situace v rodině. Finanční a dluhové poradenství.
Cena služby
Bezplatná
Nové hodnocení
“AI expends a lot of energy being polite, especially if the user is polite, saying ‘please’ and ‘thank you,’” трипскан вход Dauner explained. “But this just makes their responses even longer, expending more energy to generate each word.” For this reason, Dauner suggests users be more straightforward when communicating with AI models. Specify the length of the answer you want and limit it to one or two sentences, or say you don’t need an explanation at all. Most important, Dauner’s study highlights that not all AI models are created equally, said Sasha Luccioni, the climate lead at AI company Hugging Face, in an email. Users looking to reduce their carbon footprint can be more intentional about which model they chose for which task. “Task-specific models are often much smaller and more efficient, and just as good at any context-specific task,” Luccioni explained. https://tripscan.biz трип скан If you are a software engineer who solves complex coding problems every day, an AI model suited for coding may be necessary. But for the average high school student who wants help with homework, relying on powerful AI tools is like using a nuclear-powered digital calculator. Even within the same AI company, different model offerings can vary in their reasoning power, so research what capabilities best suit your needs, Dauner said. When possible, Luccioni recommends going back to basic sources — online encyclopedias and phone calculators — to accomplish simple tasks. Why it’s hard to measure AI’s environmental impact Putting a number on the environmental impact of AI has proved challenging. The study noted that energy consumption can vary based on the user’s proximity to local energy grids and the hardware used to run AI models. That’s partly why the researchers chose to represent carbon emissions within a range, Dauner said. Furthermore, many AI companies don’t share information about their energy consumption — or details like server size or optimization techniques that could help researchers estimate energy consumption, said Shaolei Ren, an associate professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of California, Riverside who studies AI’s water consumption. “You can’t really say AI consumes this much energy or water on average — that’s just not meaningful. We need to look at each individual model and then (examine what it uses) for each task,” Ren said. One way AI companies could be more transparent is by disclosing the amount of carbon emissions associated with each prompt, Dauner suggested.
“It’s true that both plants are not yet operating at the capacity we originally targeted,” said the Climeworks spokesperson. tripskan “Like all transformative innovations, progress is iterative, and some steps may take longer than anticipated,” they said. The company’s prospective third plant in Louisiana aims to remove 1 million tons of carbon a year by 2030, but it’s uncertain whether construction will proceed under the Trump administration. A Department of Energy spokesperson said a department-wide review was underway “to ensure all activities follow the law, comply with applicable court orders and align with the Trump administration’s priorities.” The government has a mandate “to unleash ‘American Energy Dominance’,” they added. Direct air capture’s success will also depend on companies’ willingness to buy carbon credits. https://tripscan.biz tripscan войти Currently companies are pretty free to “use the atmosphere as a waste dump,” said Holly Buck, assistant professor of environment and sustainability at the University at Buffalo. “This lack of regulation means there is not yet a strong business case for cleaning this waste up,” she told CNN. Another criticism leveled at Climeworks is its failure to offset its own climate pollution. The carbon produced by its corporate activities, such as office space and travel, outweighs the carbon removed by its plants. The company says its plants already remove more carbon than they produce and corporate emissions “will become irrelevant as the size of our plants scales up.” Some, however, believe the challenges Climeworks face tell a broader story about direct air capture. This should be a “wake-up call,” said Lili Fuhr, director of the fossil economy program at the Center for International Environmental Law. Climeworks’ problems are not “outliers,” she told CNN, “but reflect persistent technical and economic hurdles faced by the direct air capture industry worldwide.” “The climate crisis demands real action, not speculative tech that overpromises and underdelivers.” she added. Some of the Climeworks’ problems are “related to normal first-of-a-kind scaling challenges with emerging complex engineering projects,” Buck said. But the technology has a steep path to becoming cheaper and more efficient, especially with US slashing funding for climate policies, she added. “This kind of policy instability and backtracking on contracts will be terrible for a range of technologies and innovations, not just direct air capture.” Direct air capture is definitely feasible but its hard, said MIT’s Buck. Whether it succeeds will depend on a slew of factors including technological improvements and creating markets for carbon removals, he said. “At this point in time, no one really knows how large a role direct air capture will play in the future.”
This company says its technology can help save the world. It’s now cutting 20% of its staff as Trump slashes climate funding трип скан Two huge plants in Iceland operate like giant vacuum cleaners, sucking in air and stripping out planet-heating carbon pollution. This much-hyped climate technology is called direct air capture, and the company behind these plants, Switzerland-based Climeworks, is perhaps its most high-profile proponent. But a year after opening a huge new facility, Climeworks is straining against strong headwinds. The company announced this month it would lay off around 20% of its workforce, blaming economic uncertainties and shifting climate policy priorities. https://trip-scan.top трип скан “We’ve always known this journey would be demanding. Today, we find ourselves navigating a challenging time,” Climeworks’ CEOs Christoph Gebald and Jan Wurzbacher said in a statement. This is particularly true of its US ambitions. A new direct air capture plant planned for Louisiana, which received $50 million in funding from the Biden administration, hangs in the balance as President Donald Trump slashes climate funding. Climeworks also faces mounting criticism for operating at only a fraction of its maximum capacity, and for failing to remove more climate pollution than it emits. The company says these are teething pains inherent in setting up a new industry from scratch and that it has entered a new phase of global scale up. “The overall trajectory will be positive as we continue to define the technology,” said a Climeworks spokesperson. For critics, however, these headwinds are evidence direct air capture is an expensive, shiny distraction from effective climate action.
Many left-wing preppers also have guns. tripscan top Killjoy is open about the fact she owns firearms but calls it one of the least important aspects of her prepping. She lives in rural Appalachia and, as a transgender woman, says the way she’s treated has changed dramatically since Trump’s first election. For those on the left, guns are “for community and self-defense,” she said. Left-wing preppers consistently say the biggest difference between them and their right-wing peers is the rejection of “bunker mentality” — the idea of filling a bunker with beans, rice, guns and ammo and expecting to be able to survive the apocalypse alone. Shonkwiler gives an example of a right-wing guy with a rifle on his back, who falls down the stairs and breaks a leg. If he doesn’t have medical training and a community to help, “he’s going to die before he gets to enjoy all his freeze-dried food.” “People are our greatest asset,” Killjoy said. When Hurricane Helene carved a path of destruction through Asheville, North Carolina in 2024, Killjoy, who used to live in the city, loaded her truck with food and generators and drove there to help. https://tripscan.biz tripskan Inshirah Overton also subscribes to the idea of community. The attorney, who came to prepping after enduring Hurricane Irene in 2011, owns a half-acre plot of land in New Jersey where she grows food and has beehives. She stores fruit, vegetables and honey but also gives them to friends and neighbors. “My plan is to create a community of people who have a vested interest in this garden,” she said. At one point, Overton toyed with the idea of buying a “bug-out” property in Vermont, somewhere to escape to, but desire for community for her and her two daughters stopped her. In Vermont, “no one knows me and I’m just a random Black lady, and they’ll be like: ‘Oh, OK, right, sure. You live here? Sure. Here’s the barrel of my shotgun. Turn around.’” This focus on community may stem in part from left-wing preppers’ growing fears around the climate crisis, predicted to usher in far-reaching ecological, social and economic breakdown. It cannot be escaped by retreating to a bunker for a few weeks. As Trump guts weather agencies, pledges to unwind the Federal Emergency Management Administration and slashes climate funding — all while promising to unleash the fossil fuel industry — climate concerns are only coming into sharper focus. They’re top of mind for Brekke Wagoner, the creator and host of the Sustainable Prepping YouTube channel, who lives in North Carolina with her four children. She fears increasingly deadly summer heat and the “once-in-a-lifetime” storms that keep coming. Climate change “is just undeniable,” she said. Her prepping journey started during Trump’s first term. She was living in California and filled with fear that in the event of a big natural disaster, the federal government would simply not be there. Her house now contains a week’s worth of water, long-term food supplies, flashlights, backup batteries and a solar generator. “My goal is for our family to have all of our needs cared for,” she said, so in an emergency, whatever help is available can go to others. “You can have a preparedness plan that doesn’t involve a bunker and giving up on civilization,” she said.
These preppers have ‘go bags,’ guns and a fear of global disaster. They’re also left-wing трипскан вход The day after President Donald Trump was elected in 2016, Eric Shonkwiler looked at his hiking bag to figure out what supplies he had. “I began to look at that as a resource for escape, should that need to happen,” he said. He didn’t have the terminology for it at the time, but this backpack was his “bug-out bag” — essential supplies for short-term survival. It marked the start of his journey into prepping. In his Ohio home, which he shares with his wife and a Pomeranian dog, Rosemary, he now has a six-month supply of food and water, a couple of firearms and a brood of chickens. “Resources to bridge the gap across a disaster,” he said. https://tripscan.biz tripskan Margaret Killjoy’s entry point was a bleak warning in 2016 from a scientist friend, who told her climate change was pushing the global food system closer than ever to collapse. Killjoy started collecting food, water and generators. She bought a gun and learned how to use it. She started a prepping podcast, Live Like the World is Dying, and grew a community. Prepping has long been dominated by those on the political right. The classic stereotype, albeit not always accurate, is of the lone wolf with a basement full of Spam, a wall full of guns, and a mind full of conspiracy theories. Shonkwiler and Killjoy belong to a much smaller part of the subculture: They are left-wing preppers. This group is also preparing for a doom-filled future, and many also have guns, but they say their prepping emphasizes community and mutual aid over bunkers and isolationism. In an era of barreling crises — from wars to climate change — some say prepping is becoming increasingly appealing to those on the left. The roots of modern-day prepping in the United States go back to the 1950s, when fears of nuclear war reached a fever pitch. The 1970s saw the emergence of the survivalist movement, which dwindled in the 1990s as it became increasingly associated with an extreme-right subculture steeped in racist ideology. A third wave followed in the early 2000s, when the term “prepper” began to be adopted more widely, said Michael Mills, a social scientist at Anglia Ruskin University, who specializes in survivalism and doomsday prepping cultures. Numbers swelled following big disasters such as 9/11, Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and the 2008 financial crisis. A watershed moment for right-wing preppers was the election of Barack Obama in 2008, Mills said. For those on the left, it was Trump’s 2016 election. Preppers of all political stripes are usually motivated by a “foggy cloud of fear” rather than a belief in one specific doomsday scenario playing out, Mills said. Broad anxieties tend to swirl around the possibility of economic crises, pandemics, natural disasters, war and terrorism. “We’ve hit every one of those” since the start of this century, said Anna Maria Bounds, a sociology professor at Queens College, who has written a book about New York’s prepper subculture. These events have solidified many preppers’ fears that, in times of crisis, the government would be “overwhelmed, under-prepared and unwilling to help,” she said.
